|
|
 Rank: Newbie Groups: Member
Joined: 5/5/2009 Posts: 2 Points: 6 Location: North Dakota
|
I am a new librarian and have been at my first professional job for just over a year now. Although I am grateful for landing a job even before graduating, I feel a bit stuck. I struggle with finding ways to expand on my current responsibilities to gain skills that apply to a bricks and mortar public or academic library. This job is quite specialized, I help maintain an electronic library of health and human services resources and provide reference services via phone and e-mail.
I do like my job--enough--but I have no long-term interest in it. I am concerned that this position does not allow for the right kinds of experiences from which to build. I would love to be a director or head of a department some day, so I want to put myself on the track for that. I held full-time jobs in various capacities for 8 years prior to and during grad school. I had leadership and supervisory responsibilities, worked with cataloging standards, and library programming. My current position offers none of these things. I feel like I have to stretch to apply my current tasks to other library jobs. Most of my applicable experience, I attained pre-MLS. I am afraid that if I stay in my current position too long, I will miss my window of opportunity.
Enough background, my questions is: Does it look poorly to hiring committees to see short job stints (1-3 yrs)? I am just starting out professionally and I am trying to find my niche-so to speak.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Management - Moderator
, Member
Joined: 1/2/2008 Posts: 348 Points: 922 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
aubreymm wrote:Does it look poorly to hiring committees to see short job stints (1-3 yrs)? I am just starting out professionally and I am trying to find my niche-so to speak. People will never frown upon someone that is looking for more opportunities and advancement. Some types of libraries do not allow for advancement, so people must move about. Changes are not negative if they show a natural progression of improvement and advancement. Committees get nervous when people jump around a lot with no reasoning to the moves.
Brian C. Gray Head of Reference & Engineering Librarian Kelvin Smith Library Case Western Reserve University http://blog.case.edu/bcg8bcg8@case.edu
|
|
 Rank: Newbie Groups: Member
Joined: 5/5/2009 Posts: 2 Points: 6 Location: North Dakota
|
Thank you for the reassurance.
On a similar note, do you know how hiring committees generally feel about employment experience attained outside of a professional librarian position? Many times, I see job announcements that want "professional experience" or "post-graduate experience". Does this mean paraprofessional experience does not count?
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Management - Moderator
, Member
Joined: 1/2/2008 Posts: 348 Points: 922 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
aubreymm wrote:On a similar note, do you know how hiring committees generally feel about employment experience attained outside of a professional librarian position? Many times, I see job announcements that want "professional experience" or "post-graduate experience". Does this mean paraprofessional experience does not count? It means you must prove your experience counts. It means you must sell that you are prepared to meet their needs. Job ads are written so that most candidates that meet the requirements will be ready for the position. Some are ready without all the experience listed. some are not even close if they do meet the requirements.
Brian C. Gray Head of Reference & Engineering Librarian Kelvin Smith Library Case Western Reserve University http://blog.case.edu/bcg8bcg8@case.edu
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/3/2008 Posts: 94 Points: 291 Location: kansas
|
I would add that if you have the experience from outside the listed parameters of a job, you should show how the experience/knowledge can be applied by you to this particular position. If you have cataloging experience, you can address that in the cover letter by stating what systems you have worked with, or that you have strong cataloging skills and look forward to learning the X system that the library uses. Be direct in how your skill applies to that job---otherwise they won't know. Stretch your limits a bit, too, as you will be surprised who wants what from an employee! And, the time span on a first job is less important than--as BC said--jumping jobs for no apparent reason.
|
|
Rank: Newbie Groups: Member
Joined: 5/19/2009 Posts: 1 Points: 3 Location: Washington
|
I'm also wondering about the timing of leaving a first job. I graduated with an MS in information science last year, and I immediately found employment, but I had to relocate. I love the job, and I get on well with my co-workers, but I'm not crazy about the city I've moved to. The city is also proving difficult for advancing my spouse's career.
We have been here almost one year, and we're planning on sticking it out at least one more year to make sure it's not just the downer after a "honeymoon" phase. I'm on a tenure track, which takes 3 years to complete. Do you all think it would it be detrimental to my career prospects to leave after only 2 years in a tenure track position (that is, if it comes to that)? Or would it be better to complete my tenure process before thinking of relocating again?
Like the original poster, I too feel worried about stagnating, since this is a small city, and I'm in a small college. I would like both a larger city and a larger academic institution for my long-term career and personal goals, but I want to "do right" by the people I work with, especially since I've been enjoying the job so much and learning a great deal from it. What do you all think?
|
|
|
Guest |