Hello!
I am a new professional who is currently looking for work out of graduate school. I have a lot of experience in academic libraries, but in my two years during my masters I was never able to break onto the reference desk as an assistant, so I had to settle for lower level assistant tech. work.
As you can read in an
earlier post, I think I have been having trouble finding a job because of my lack of practical experience. It seems that all my interviewers say that while I am an excellent candidate, there were others with a year or more of experience beating me out. Partially this may have to do with the fact that I am in an urban centre, and others may have gained experience elsewhere and are now applying to where they want to live.
I had been resigned to the fact that I would have to move to get experience. However, today a applied arts and technical college called me today for an interview at the end of the week.
Knowing that I want to end up (right now at least) working in an academic library preferably, and a research library in the end, what are people's thoughts about "settling" for a 2-year college vs a 4-year university. I don't know if the fact that
Canada makes a sharp distinction between the two matters either.
I am afraid that if I were to take this job I would be branded as a college guy and have an equally difficult time breaking into the university arena later as I am having now. I will say that I do publish book reviews of academic works regularly, and I am sure I could publish articles focused on universities. Or I was even thinking about writing about college students doing bridging work, and serving them---that is unique I think.
What are people's thoughts, particularly those doing the hiring?