Yes, we have no bananas

So I was flipping through the March issue of American Libraries (yes, I still like the paper version) and came across a letter that reads:

Your Inside Scoop blog posting, “Obama Invokes Libraries at Governor’s Conference” (Dec. 3, 2008) was a total tear-jerker. It made my day.

It made me not mind having to work another holiday weekend to get ready for another busy week of supporting my school’s awesome students and their talented teachers.

It made me not care that I had to share a banana with my husband at breakfast this morning because we had to dip into our meager monthly food budget to buy extra supplies for the library. [emphasis added]

It made me proud to be a librarian and it made me proud to be an American. Thank you.

Taking pride in your job, good! Going the extra mile for kids? Good! Not having enough money to buy a second banana? Double plus ungood.

Part of taking pride in our profession involves recognizing our own value. Yes, it’s important to have a well-stocked library. Yes, sometimes we do have to go above and beyond, work weekends, bring work home, do work outside our normal “jobs.” But when we’re going the extra mile and don’t have enough money to buy food? Something has to give.

No offense intended to the letter-writer, who’s clearly devoted to her job. However, libraries are more than their collections — if we’re going to argue that we add value above and beyond a room full of books (or a site full of databases), then we need to actually appreciate our own value.

Leave a comment

  • March 11, 2009 at 3:49 pm Rachel Singer Gordon
    Did this strike anyone else or am I overreacting??
  • March 11, 2009 at 4:01 pm Rachel Walden
    Yeah, I don't think we should encourage people to be so self-sacrificing that they can't buy food b/c they spent the money on their job - that shouldn't be applauded, it should be recognized as a serious problem. Seems unhealthy for both workers and workplaces.
  • March 11, 2009 at 4:39 pm Rachel Singer Gordon
    Friend just emailed and said she read the letter as sarcasm -- hmm.
  • March 11, 2009 at 4:43 pm Jason P
    I'm not sure I see the sarcasm either, Rachel.
  • March 11, 2009 at 4:44 pm Steve Lawson
    I was wondering if it was failed satire--it seemed so extreme.
  • March 11, 2009 at 5:00 pm Sleepy McSleepinator
    AL publishes the weirdest crap these days...
  • March 11, 2009 at 5:02 pm Walt Crawford
    When I read it, I couldn't decide between satire ("failed," as Steve says) and a bad misunderstanding of work/life balance.
  • March 11, 2009 at 5:17 pm Rachel Walden
    Perhaps the satire fails because of magnificently bad timing - it's not so amusing or obvious when some people probably really are facing the prospect of limited food.
  • March 11, 2009 at 5:57 pm Walt Crawford
    Jill: That one's easy. AmLib typically publishes the most provocative letters it receives. So does LJ. So does almost every newspaper and magazine.

Add a comment on FriendFeed