My brother’s unit just saw its first casualties — for those of you keeping him in your thoughts. We’ve been unable to talk by phone/Internet for a couple of weeks now, since he’s out in the field with no access.
Archive for March 2007
Normally I try to avoid me-tooism, but, after probably the 150th time I saw someone talk about Google Reader, I finally decided to import my subscriptions yesterday. This thing runs circles around Bloglines, is all I have to say. If this is the 151st time you’ve seen someone say this, check it out for yourself! That’s all; I can’t contribute anything else that hasn’t been said.
The discussion on well-known library bloggers made me wonder — what do people read outside the library field? I never get to play the meme game with anyone, so thought I’d attempt to start my own…
Here are five random picks out of the non-library blogs I follow:
The Lipstick Chronicles – (mild nsfw warning) is pretty much just for fun. Written by four authors who “write books that combine elements of chick lit, mystery and romance,” it gets into the writing process, kids, sex, family, books, and whatever else have you.
Barbara’s Blog: Barbara Ehrenreich Comments on Working in America – If you’ve found her books interesting, you’ll probably also find her blog interesting, although it’s only updated sporadically.
Bitch Ph.D. – Academia, parenting, and feminism, what’s not to like?
Boing Boing – I admit that I wait for Boing Boing to approach a couple hundred new posts, then do a massive skim. But the mix of fun, weird, and thought-provoking pointers make it worth dropping by.
Inkygirl: Daily Diversions for Writers – Thoughts on the publishing process, mixed with cartoons.
So what do you read that’s absolutely not library-related? If you’re a library blogger reading this, consider yourself tagged, and tag your own post fiveblogs.
Library Journal has posted its March 2007 “Movers & Shakers” supplement. If you’re feeling down on the field, go and read about some of these folks to get yourself energized again. Congratulations to everyone — I was lucky enough to get to write a few of the profiles, so if you’re bored on a Sunday night, you can play a little game and guess which ones .
(On a totally unrelated note, I just noticed Blogger didn’t update for daylight savings time. Hmm.)
A couple of the respondents to the alternative careers survey mentioned that they keep up by reading library blogs, but added parenthetically that they find the well-known blog/bloggers to be too inbred, too repetitive, and too busy patting each other on the back. I’ve heard people say this before, and I’m wondering how prevalent this feeling is.
I usually like seeing several bloggers take on a given issue, because each tends to have different insights and bring in different links. But, I also try to subscribe to a variety of blogs, as well as to less well-known blogs, to avoid becoming my own filter. While I dearly love my Bloglines (and keep meaning to check out that Google Reader people are raving about — another reason for repetition, since it takes several times to sink through my head!), I try to be aware of the dangers of confirmation bias as I note myself jumping to the bloggers that I most agree with and skimming over those I don’t.
I find This Week in LibraryBlogLand and Carnival of the Infosciences helpful in bringing in ideas and bloggers I might otherwise miss. But, I’m curious: What do you all do to overcome your own confirmation bias? Do you still read the “big name” bloggers?
In other news, we picked up Jake’s new glasses today — I obviously now need to learn how to take photos without creating a horrible glare off the lenses.
He’s looking forward to being a big brother one of these days, although he did ask if we could possibly instead adopt a “baby lion cub. You know, like in Lion King?”
We spent a lovely St. Patrick’s day yesterday at an all-day international adoption seminar, which is a requirement both of our agency and for foster care licensing for this purpose in Illinois. If you should ever have occasion to attend one of these things, be prepared for people to bandy about scary terms like “attachment disorder” and “failure to thrive.” We were heartened again, however, by the parent panel at the end of the day, complete with cute babies and toddlers galore — all of whom looked fairly attached and thriving to us!
Ms. Orenstein asked: Could every woman at the large rectangular table name one specific subject that she is an expert in and say why? The author of â€œLittle Red Riding Hood Uncloaked: Sex, Morality and the Evolution of a Fairy Tale,â€ Ms. Orenstein began by saying, â€œLittle Red Riding Hoodâ€ and writing the words in orange marker on an oversize white pad.
Of the next four women who spoke, three started with a qualification or apology. â€œIâ€™m really too young to be an expert in anything,â€ said Caitlin Petre, 23.
â€œLetâ€™s stop,â€ Ms. Orenstein said. â€œIt happens in every single session I do with women, and itâ€™s never happened with men.â€ Women tend to back away from â€œwhat we know and why we know it,â€ she said.
After the presentations Ms. Orenstein returned to the orange-colored words â€œLittle Red Riding Hoodâ€ written on the pad, saying that if she had limited herself to that subject, her contribution to public debate would be about the size of a tack.
â€œI would have to reframe myself,â€ she said, drawing a triangle around the words. At each of the three points she explained how she set about enlarging her area of expertise: from Riding Hood to female heroines to women; from fairy tales to myths to stories we tell and are told; from the nursery to popular culture.
This is true for professional writing, as well — not to mention true of our larger careers. When we negate our own expertise, we become less effective in imparting our importance as professionals, and our self-effacing attitude hurts us in areas from salaries, to promotions, to our ability to grasp new opportunities.
As I’m going through the responses to the alternative careers survey, it’s becoming clear that the ability to claim, reframe, and broaden our knowledge bases and skillsets is essential, not only when moving to a nontraditional setting, but in responding to both internal and external changes.