<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Britannicalooza</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lisjobs.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lisjobs.com/blog/?p=302</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:31:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.lisjobs.com/blog/?p=302&#038;cpage=1#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lisjobs.com/blog/?p=302#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d assume it was written before the latest? But who knows. I&#039;m also noting that I now appear to be on some kind of Britznnica marketing list; they&#039;re emailing wanting to sell me all sorts of different things. Go figure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d assume it was written before the latest? But who knows. I&#8217;m also noting that I now appear to be on some kind of Britznnica marketing list; they&#8217;re emailing wanting to sell me all sorts of different things. Go figure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: librarybob</title>
		<link>http://www.lisjobs.com/blog/?p=302&#038;cpage=1#comment-1850</link>
		<dc:creator>librarybob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lisjobs.com/blog/?p=302#comment-1850</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a fairly neutral article given some of the &quot;editorial cadre&quot; issues that have cropped up at Wikipedia of late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a fairly neutral article given some of the &#8220;editorial cadre&#8221; issues that have cropped up at Wikipedia of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>